Remote Laboratory Based on FPGA Devices for Education 4.0

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61467/2007.1558.2026.v17i1.1173

Keywords:

Education 4.0, remote laboratory, Embedded System, evaluation model

Abstract

This paper reports a remote laboratory architecture for Education 4.0 applied to Digital Logic Design courses using FPGA devices. The development of the proposed architecture is based on embedded systems, in which the V-model methodology and an Internet of Things (IoT) technological environment are applied. Nine laboratory exercises were designed for the proposed remote laboratory. To evaluate learners’ acceptance of the remote laboratory, the Technology Acceptance Model was used. An evaluation instrument comprising six variables and 21 pre-coded items on a Likert scale was designed and administered to 28 learners via a survey. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients calculated for the six variables ranged from 0.72 to 0.91, suggesting adequate reliability of the evaluation instrument. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied, yielding a p-value below the significance threshold of 0.001, which indicates statistical support for learners’ acceptance of the remote laboratory.

 

Smart citations: https://scite.ai/reports/10.61467/2007.1558.2026.v17i1.1173
Dimensions.
Open Alex.

Author Biographies

Josefina Barcenas Lopez, Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología de la UNAM

Graduate of the Faculty of Engineering at UNAM with a degree in Mechanical-Electrical Engineering, specializing in Digital Systems. Master’s degree in Communication and Educational Technology (ILCE). Ph.D. in Pedagogy from the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters at UNAM, with a research focus on Information Technologies and Education. Currently coordinating the Telematics for Education group at the Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnolog´ıa (ICAT) at UNAM

Enrique Ruiz-Velasco Sanchez, Instituto de Investigaciones sobre la Universidad y la Educacion de la UNAM

Senior Researcher C in the Sociocultural Diversity in Education area at the Instituto de Investigaciones Sobre la Universidad y la Educacion (IISUE) ´ at UNAM. Ph.D. from the University of Montreal, Canada and Postdoctorate in Science and Technology from the University of London, England. He has focused his research on regular and online educational models, specifically in the design and development of technological models for fostering scientific thinking in students of all educational levels and strengthening the scientific training of academics. His general field of action has been Artificial Intelligence in Education, the design of virtual learning environments, and more specifically, Pedagogical Robotics

References

Álvarez Ariza, J. Á., & González Gil, S. (2022). RaspyLab: A low-cost remote laboratory to learn programming and physical computing through Python and Raspberry Pi. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 17(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2022.3166877

AMD. (2025). Vivado Design Suite User Guide: Using the Vivado IDE (UG893). Retrieved June 15, 2025, from https://docs.amd.com/r/en-US/ug893-vivado-ide/Using-the-Vivado-IDE

Asociación de Internet MX. (2024). 20o Estudio sobre los hábitos de usuarios de internet en México. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://irp.cdn-website.com/81280eda/files/uploaded/20_Ha-bitos_de_Usuarios_de_Internet_en_Me-xico_2024_VP.pdf

Booch, G., Jacobson, I., & Rumbaugh, J. (1996). The unified modeling language. Unix Review, 14(13), 5.

Brown, C. E. (1998). Coefficient of variation. In Applied multivariate statistics in geohydrology and related sciences (pp. 155-157). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Butt, R., Siddiqui, H., Soomro, R. A., & Asad, M. M. (2020). Integration of Industrial Revolution 4.0 and IoTs in academia: A state-of-the-art review on the concept of Education 4.0 in Pakistan. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2020-0022

Chevalier, A., Copot, C., Ionescu, C. M., & De Keyser, R. (2016). A three-year feedback study of a remote laboratory used in control engineering studies. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2605080

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Digilent Inc. (2025). Nexys4 DDR™ FPGA Reference Manual. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://digilent.com/reference/programmable-logic/nexys-4-ddr/reference-manual

Downes, S. (2022). Connectivism. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6173510

Flores Olvera, D.M., Guzmán Games, F.J., Martínez Barragán, Y.M., Ibarra Cruz, E., & Alvear Cortés, E. (2020). Educación 4.0, origen para su fundamentación. Contribuciones de la tecnología digital en el desarrollo educativo y social, 165-177. Eindhoven, NL: Adaya Press.

Fujieda, N., & Okuchi, A. (2023, November). A novel remote FPGA lab platform using MCU-based controller board. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

Fundación México-Estados Unidos para la Ciencia (FUMEC). (2022). FUMEC a 30 años de su creación. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://www.fumec.org/Publicaciones

Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Haberland, M., Burovski, E., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Striega, K. (2024). scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.15.0 [Software]. Zenodo.

IEEE. (2019). IEEE standard for VHDL language reference manual (IEEE Std 1076-2019) (pp. 1–673). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8938196

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2024). Encuesta Nacional sobre Disponibilidad y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información en los Hogares (ENDUTIH). Recuperado el 15 de marzo de 2025, de https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/endutih/2024/

Ishak, R., & Mansor, M. (2020). The relationship between knowledge management and organizational learning with academic staff readiness for education 4.0. Eurasian Journal Education. 85, 169–184.

Jalilibal, Z., Amiri, A., Castagliola, P., & Khoo, M. B. (2021). Monitoring the coefficient of variation: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 161, 107600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107600

Kramp, T., Van Kranenburg, R., & Lange, S. (2013). Introduction to the Internet of Things. In Enabling things to talk: Designing IoT solutions with the IoT architectural reference model (pp. 1-10). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Kumar, S., Tiwari, P., & Zymbler, M. (2019). Internet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: A review. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0269-8

Melosik, M., Naumowicz, M., Kropidłowski, M., & Marszalek, W. (2022). Remote prototyping of FPGA-based devices in the IoT concept during the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronics, 11(9), 1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11091497

Milenkovic, M. (2020). Internet of Things: Concepts and System Design. Springer Nature.

MIPI Alliance. (n.d.). MIPI CSI-2® specification. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://www.mipi.org/specifications/csi-2

Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018). Cyber-physical systems and education 4.0: The teaching factory 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005

Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664

Naciones Unidas. (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe (LC/G.2681-P/Rev.3). Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

Navas-González, R., Oballe-Peinado, Ó., Castellanos-Ramos, J., Rosas-Cervantes, D., & Sánchez-Durán, J. A. (2023). Practice projects for an FPGA-based remote laboratory to teach and learn digital electronics. Information, 14(10), 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14100558

Núñez-Barriopedro, E., Monclúz, I. M., & Ravina-Ripoll, R. (2019). El impacto de la utilización de la modalidad B-learning en la educación superior. Alteridad. Revista de Educación, 14(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v14n1.2019.02

Oviedo, H. C., & Campo-Arias, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34(4), 572–580.

Pandas development team. (n.d.). User guide. Retrieved June 15, 2025, from https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/user_guide/index.html

Project Jupyter. (n.d.). Project Jupyter documentation. Retrieved June 15, 2025, from https://docs.jupyter.org/en/latest/

Puncreobutr, R. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 92–97.

Raspberry Pi Ltd. (2025). Raspberry Pi Camera Module 2. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/camera-module-v2/

Raspberry Pi Ltd. (2025b). Raspberry Pi 4 Model B: Product brief. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://datasheets.raspberrypi.com/rpi4/raspberry-pi-4-product-brief.pdf

Raspberry Pi Ltd. (2025c). Operating system images. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://www.raspberrypi.com/software/operating-systems/

Ríos, A. R., & Peña, A. M. P. (2020). Estadística inferencial. Elección de una prueba estadística no paramétrica en investigación científica. Horizonte de la Ciencia, 10(19), 191-208.

Schwab, K. (2016). La cuarta revolución industrial. Ginebra, Suiza: World Economic Forum.

Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

Sony. (2025). IMX219PQH5-C. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://github.com/rellimmot/Sony-IMX219-Raspberry-Pi-V2-CMOS.

Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18

Trilla, J., & García Carrasco, E. (2001). El legado pedagógico del siglo XX para la escuela del siglo XXI (Vol. 241). Barcelona, España: Graó.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). Informe de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible 2023: Edición especial. Naciones Unidas. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023_Spanish.pdf

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.

Vargas, G. A. T., & Durá Martínez, R. A. (2014). El cómputo ubicuo y su importancia para la construcción del internet de las cosas y el big data. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 24(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2014.v24.n2.47491

Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968

Xilinx Inc. (n.d.). 7 series product selection guide: Artix-7 FPGAs. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://docs.amd.com/v/u/en-US/7-series-product-selection-guide

Downloads

Published

2026-01-02

How to Cite

Garcia Ortega, V. H., Barcenas Lopez, J., & Ruiz-Velasco Sanchez, E. (2026). Remote Laboratory Based on FPGA Devices for Education 4.0. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 17(1), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.61467/2007.1558.2026.v17i1.1173

Issue

Section

CNIIS 2025